By Tracy Cassels
We’ve probably all been told that we can’t go back once we’ve started something with our kids. It may be something we said no to, but it can also be when we’re trying to make a change that they are resisting. Take, for example, the parent who said no to getting in the tub with their child and the child just keeps asking over and over. Most of us buy into the idea that once we have made up our minds about something and set our course, we have to stick to it. Giving in, or going back, is giving up our power, looking “weak”, or something like that.
If we want our kids to respect us and move forward, we think we need to stick to our guns. Except we don’t.
Let’s start with the first issue of giving in once we’ve said “no”. Now, I want to be clear that I am not advocating that you give in all the time or even without good reason, but I do want to open up the idea that giving in does not mean instant disaster. In fact, quite the opposite. Sometimes we say no without thinking about it, or we see that we’ve said no to something that really means a lot to our kids. In these cases, reversing course is actually a way of showing our children that we are responding to them. We are showing them that they have a voice after all.
Think about a child who may have asked to have their parent join them in the tub.
If there is no real reason to say no and the parent has changed their mind about not wanting to, then there is no good reason not to backtrack.
We think our kids will assume they can run all over us if we suddenly “give in”. I like to think of it differently. I think we show our children a very important skill: that they can sometimes affect change if it means enough to them and others are willing to go along.
On the flipside, when we dig our heels in no matter what, we are teaching our children a version of learned helplessness. That no matter what it is, we will never budge or change. This can have negative consequences when our children are older. It might mean that when our kids are older and may want to go to a party, if they assume we will say no, they will simply find a way to sneak out instead of learning how to make their case to us. It also means that they may not respect the “no”s that we give, assuming they are all unfair. In contrast, when we show them we can change, they are more likely to believe our “no”s have reasoning that we can explain. It’s not 100% foolproof, but it definitely can make the later years easier.
Now what about the child who is experiencing a change? I think here of situations like night weaning or starting daycare.
We often push our kids to a certain degree and the idea is they just have to keep moving forward.
Stepping back will mean the unravelling of all that has been done; give an inch and they’ll take a mile, is what you’ll be told. But this begs the question: How is this type of forward progress a sign of responsiveness? How are we showing our children that we are responding to their individual needs and emotions if all we do is feel we need to plow forward?
